There is a claim that in nearly 60 years of NASA’s supposed space exploration, the agency has not been able to provide a single authentic photograph of Earth from space. Despite the fact that high-resolution cameras have been available for almost a century, NASA has allegedly never taken a genuine photograph of our planet. Some people use this claim to argue that NASA is deceiving the public. However, it is important to note that NASA has released numerous photographs of Earth from space, including iconic images such as the Blue Marble and the Earthrise. These photographs have provided valuable insights into our planet’s geography, weather patterns, and environmental changes over time.
There is a claim that all the images released by NASA are either composites, paintings, or computer-generated images. This has led some to question whether NASA has ever been in space or whether their images are accurate representations of Earth. However, it is important to note that NASA has provided numerous images of Earth from space that have been widely accepted as accurate representations.
Some conspiracy theorists argue that NASA’s failure to provide a single authentic photograph of Earth from space suggests that the agency has not been far enough from Earth to capture the entire planet in a single image. However, this claim is unfounded, as NASA has captured many images of Earth from various distances and angles.
Additionally, some have pointed out apparent irregularities in the trajectories of rockets and launches depicted in NASA images. However, it is important to consider that images of rocket launches are often taken using extended exposures, which can make the trajectories appear different than they would during normal TV coverage. While there may be instances where images have been altered or manipulated, there is no evidence to support the claim that all of NASA’s images are composites or fake.
Houston, we have another problem….
The Van Allen radiation belts, which are deadly radiation bands surrounding the Earth, could potentially damage spacecraft and harm astronauts. These belts begin at an altitude of 1,000 miles (1,600 kilometers) and extend an additional 25,000 miles (40233 kilometers). Despite this danger, the Apollo missions were able to successfully pass through the Van Allen belts during the 1960s.
NASA engineer Kelly Smith has attempted to explain how the Apollo missions were able to navigate through the Van Allen belts, which is a question that some conspiracy theorists use to argue that NASA’s claims of space exploration are fraudulent. However, it is important to note that NASA has developed new technologies and strategies to protect astronauts from radiation exposure since the Apollo missions. While space exploration does come with inherent risks, NASA takes extensive precautions to ensure the safety of its astronauts.
Three naughty schoolboys
Some people still doubt the authenticity of the Apollo moon landing, citing the behavior of the Apollo 11 astronauts at their press conference immediately after returning to Earth. Despite having supposedly just completed the greatest adventure in human history and becoming national heroes, the astronauts appeared subdued, nervously watching their teleprompters and responding in a seemingly rehearsed manner to questions from journalists. Some have pointed to their lack of excitement and the fact that they appeared to be avoiding eye contact with each other as evidence that the moon landing was a hoax.
However, it is important to consider that the astronauts had just returned from a grueling and dangerous mission, and may have been exhausted and overwhelmed rather than jubilant. Additionally, it is common for public figures to prepare and rehearse their responses to questions before a press conference. While the behavior of the Apollo 11 astronauts may seem strange to some, it is not necessarily evidence of a conspiracy to fake the moon landing.
At minute 01:04:42 of the Apollo 11 Press Conference, Neil Armstrong was asked if he remembered seeing a star in the lunar sky. This was apparently a subject the crew was trying to avoid, as it would be difficult to simulate the correct astrological positions of the constellations in the false lunar backgrounds. Armstrong mistakenly responded with “I do not remember,” to which Buzz Aldrin reacted with annoyance (as if one could forget an important detail they witnessed firsthand in their supposed universally unique experience). To help Armstrong recover from this difficult question, crew member Michael Collins interposed himself and said, “I do not remember seeing any.” However, Collins was not even present during the moon landing (it was Buzz Aldrin who supposedly stepped on the surface of the moon with Armstrong).
Some people argue that it may not even be possible to send objects into space or put them into Earth’s orbit. There are three significant obstacles to achieving this, and these must be considered within our “reality framework” in order to determine what is truly possible and what NASA claims may be fraudulent. However, it is important to note that scientific evidence and advancements in technology have proven that it is indeed possible to send objects into space and keep them in orbit around the Earth. While there may be challenges and obstacles to space exploration and travel, NASA and other space agencies continue to push the boundaries of what is possible through research and innovation.
- The Thermosphere
Forget about the lethal Van Allen radiation belts, which extend for thousands of kilometers around the Earth. The main reason why nothing has gone into space is the Thermosphere. This atmospheric layer begins about 50 miles (80 km) high, where temperatures begin to rise to the Karman line that reaches 62 miles (100 km). Beyond this point, the heat increases drastically, rising rapidly to 125 miles (200 km), where temperatures can reach 2500°C.
For reference: the oven in your kitchen can reach 240°C maximum. A crematorium reaches 1000°C, and a blast furnace to melt iron can reach as high as 2300°C. NASA uses aluminum, magnesium, titanium, and epoxy-graphite composite materials to build its spacecraft, all of which would melt at these high temperatures in the thermosphere. Both aluminum and magnesium melt at 660°C, titanium at 1668°C. While graphite has a high melting point (5500°C), it is also an excellent conductor of heat, although your spacecraft will most likely disintegrate long before astronauts are cooked to ashes! Humans cannot survive exposures above 70°C.
- The Orbiting Mechanism
What things float in space when they are beyond 100 km from Earth? Does gravity magically stop affecting objects at this distance? The official answer is that above 100 kilometers, the objects are essentially in free fall, but if something travels fast enough laterally, like the space shuttle at 28,000 km/h, then this velocity will cause the object to fall constantly along the convex curve of the Earth, in this way it never reaches the ground – hence the maintenance of itself “in orbit”.
This is known as the theory of gravity, the extrapolation of an idea originally conceived by Isaac Newton in the 17th century, and today increasingly rejected by people of clearer thoughts who have their feet firmly on the ground. In fact, Newton himself, after a certain contemplation, thought about the practical application of his ridiculous theory, as he explained in a letter to a friend, Richard Bentley in 1692:
“That gravity should be innate, inherent and essential to matter, so that one body can act on another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of anything else, through and through which its action and force can to be transmitted from one to another, is for me such an absurdity that I believe that no man, who has a competent faculty of thinking in philosophical matters, can never fall into it.” – Isaac Newton
The idea that a body with enough mass can exert a force of attraction on another, as a planet is supposed to have on its moon (astronauts and spacecraft), has never been proven or disproven. A growing number of physicists are questioning whether gravity exists at all.
- The Abundance of Counterfeit
If NASA really put things into orbit, sent men to the Moon, and launched probes into outer space, then why is there so much secrecy, subterfuge, and falsification of it? And the biggest condemnation of all, why cannot NASA produce a simple genuine photograph of Earth from space? (NASA is a lie)
The famous “Blue Marble”
Isn’t that precious? Well, it isn’t true! If you click on the image, you will be able to notice that this iconic image (aoe) was clumsily edited using fictitious “satellite” data. Claims that both the original photograph of Apollo 17 (lue lue мarle I) and the 2002 image are fakes have been made in response to the anomaly of duplicating clouds. This in turn has caused some people to question whether everything NASA did and said was true.
According to NASA, this magnificent image of the “lue marle” is the most accurate true-color representation of the entire planet to yet.
Scientists and visualizers stitched together miles of oserations of the Earth’s surface using a set of oserations based on satellites, oceans, sea ice, and clouds in a continuous мosaic of true color froм each square kilometer of our planet.
It’s all about expectations, says the artist from NASA:
The last time someone captured an overhead image of low Earth orbit that displayed a complete hemisphere (one side of the sun) was during Apollo 17 in 1972. A health check of the Earth was to be performed by the satellites of NASA’s Earth Observation System (EOS). By the year 2002, we had gathered enough information to take an instantaneous snapshot of the entire planet. What we did was that.
“Creating a flat map of the Earth’s surface using the four-month satellite data was the hardest task.
Most of this study was completed by Reto Stockli, who is currently employed by the Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatics.
The spherical was then encircled with the flat мap.
My role in the process was to integrate the surface, clouds, and oceans people’s expectations of how Earth looks froм space. That Ƅall Ƅecaмe the faмous Blue MarƄle. “ – RoƄert Siммon, artist at NASA.
All ʋery fascinating, Ƅut would not it Ƅe easier to siмply take a photograph – alone a photograph – froм one of its мore than 3000 satellites? Apparently not. The good people of NASA tell us that the only ‘photos’ of the entire Earth were taken during the Apollo 17 мission. The fact that this мission, along with all the other Apollo мissions, neʋer really left the earth, are going to Do the search for these proƄleмatic photos.
SEE – A NASA image shows a мetal sheet with a perfect circle on Mars, extraterrestrial eʋidence?
The passage raises questions about the authenticity of NASA’s space program and suggests that the agency may have a monopoly over space artifacts, making it difficult to verify their claims independently. The passage also mentions Sir Richard Branson’s attempt to explore space independently of NASA, highlighting the desire for independent verification of NASA’s claims. The passage concludes by suggesting that if NASA’s claims are untrue, it would lead to a completely new reality without moon landings, satellites, the Hubble telescope, the International Space Station, or missions to Mars. The passage also questions the existence of gravity and implies that NASA’s “Blue Marble” image may be a fabrication.
Source: www.infinityexplorers.coм
